• Installing latest build of Win­dows Mobile on my phone. I've gotten the rein­stall of my entire system down to 15 min­utes! #
• Woot! @Tim­O­R­eilly retweeted one of my @RITOPL posts on the new dual screen ebook read­ers. See the related arti­cle http://​bit.​ly/​1​LDjFM #
• I am addicted to the Sym­phony of Sci­ence auto­tun­ning mashups of Carl Sagan, Bill Nye, Steven Hawk­ings and others – http://​bit.​ly/​2​N8IIW #
• Got ques­tions about eInk tech­nol­ogy? The OPL is going to inter­view eInk Corp (http://​bit.​ly/​QX27u). Please send us ques­tions to ask. #
• @laerm just made me real­ize that we need new "e" and "i" lig­a­tures (like eI, eR and iP) for all this new tech > @gar­retvoorhees get on it! #
• Life Mag­a­zine has a sense of humor — "30 Dumb Inventions" includ­ing a number of dif­fer­ent "super cigarettes" – http://​bit.​ly/​9RMGW #
• Inter­ested in polit­i­cal talk? An solid analy­sis on the 'problem' talk radio causes the GOP from @dav­eweigel: http://​bit.​ly/​1​kxW8f #
• RZA of the Wu Tang Clan: "Me being a geek helped hip hop grow" & "I'd rather raise nerds than raise gangsters." http://​bit.​ly/​3​xYktf #
• GAH! Sugar pump­kin so hard to cut… $@!#$ Pot luck…. #

Pow­ered by Twit­ter Tools

Two weeks ago at the online O’Reilly Tools of Change con­fer­ence, I closed a pre­sen­ta­tion on eRead­ers with a dis­cus­sion of the Microsoft Courier, a dual touch-​screen dig­i­tal codex. In theory, Microsoft will be bring­ing this 7” fold­ing com­puter to market some­time next year. What excites me about this device, in terms of eRead­ing, is the poten­tial for new inter­ac­tions with a text. One obvi­ous option is to actu­ally read an eBook in codex format (as we would a tra­di­tional “paper” book). How­ever, that’s not really par­tic­u­larly inter­est­ing, nor does it nec­es­sar­ily take advan­tage of the real poten­tial of this sort of device to create rev­o­lu­tion­ary new forms of reading.

How might the second screen enhance read­ing? I’m not sure, and I haven’t had a chance to really wres­tle with that. But we can look to the exam­ple of the Nin­tendo DS portable gaming system. A key fea­ture that dif­fer­en­ti­ates it from the Playsta­tion Portable(PSP) is the inte­gra­tion of a second, touch sen­si­tive screen, into game expe­ri­ence. Given the pos­si­bil­i­ties that opened up, we shouldn’t be sur­prised if sim­i­lar things happen with read­ing when we add a second screen. But, in order for that to happen, some­thing else needs to occur.

Beyond the Courier’s inno­v­a­tive form, it has another key advan­tage over exist­ing eRead­ers – it’s a soft­ware devel­op­ment plat­form. I can’t go out and down­load soft­ware to run on a Kindle. This means that the way we read on it, and other eRead­ers, is restricted to how their design­ers imag­ine we should read on them. While I trust Amazon to be experts at deliv­er­ing con­tent to the device, I don’t asso­ciate them with inno­va­tion in terms of read­ing; nor do I look to Apple or Microsoft (or Google… more on that in a sec) for that matter.

Just as modern print­ing was started by an run-​of-​the-​mill gold­smith in Mainz¹ , I think that a truly rev­o­lu­tion­ary form of on-​screen text inter­ac­tion is prob­a­bly going to be cre­ated by a pro­gram­mer that nobody has ever heard of (maybe a member of the Open Pub­lish­ing Lab). In order for that to happen, eRead­ers need to be able to have Soft­ware Devel­op­ment Kits and run third party soft­ware.²

Bottom line, beyond price point and color, at the con­fer­ence I said the future was mul­ti­ple screens and open soft­ware devel­op­ment. Why didn’t I buy a lot­tery ticket that day??!! Since the con­fer­ence, three new eRead­ers have been either hinted at or announced that all fea­ture dual screens. And, if I’m read­ing the tea leaves right at least two of those will sup­port third party software.

Each of the units fea­tures one eInk dis­play and one LCD dis­play. Two are tablet format with side-​by-​side dis­plays. The third is a codex like the Courier. And, per­haps most inter­est­ing, if the rumors are true, all three will run Google’s Android Mobile OS.

The first reader, and the one we know the least about, is the just announced Barnes and Noble Nook. It fea­tures two screens and runs, accord­ing to Giz­modo, Android. Giz­modo, an indis­pens­able web­site for stay­ing on top of tech devel­op­ments, also ran the fol­low­ing “leaked” ren­der­ings of the device. And at $259, the same price as the single eInk screen Kindle, Amazon should be con­cerned. The Nook adds a number of new fea­tures includ­ing unique abil­ity for users to lend eBooks to friends. For a full com­par­i­son, see Barnes and Noble’s com­par­i­son of the Nook to the Kindle.

The other two read­ers were announced this week. The first of these two is the Spring Design Alex eReader. Like the B&N model, it’s a tablet with neigh­bor­ing eInk and touch sen­si­tive LCD screens. And, based on the press release, it’s def­i­nitely run­ning Android. Also, like the B&N reader, it fea­tures tele­phony net­work­ing, via a GSM chip which means that it can access the web in the US and Europe. Spring Design also says that it will have expand­able memory via SD cards. The sim­i­lar­ity between it and the B&N device, in terms of fea­tures and form fac­tors does lead one to wonder if there might be an OEM agree­ment between the two companies.

The final eReader is the enTourage eDGe™. The eDGe is a codex design which folds down to 8.5” x 10.75” x 1” (approx­i­mately the size of an aver­age hard cover) with side-​by-​side sen­si­tive eInk (stylus) and LCD (touch) screens. It will be expand­able via USB and SD card and will have audio and video play­back capa­bil­i­ties. Unlike the pro­posed Microsoft Courier, it doesn’t have a camera. And another big dif­fer­ence, like the Alex, it’s run­ning Android. It’s also $490, which means that it has a tough road to hoe.

From a brief bit of research, there’s noth­ing float­ing around the web to sug­gest that Android is opti­mized for dual screen dis­play. In fact, the only other dual screen Android device I was able to find is a Russ­ian cell phone. That said its a free, open, wire­less plat­form and oper­at­ing system. It does every­thing a device needs to act like a com­puter, uses little power, and sup­ports end­less out­side devel­op­ment.³ And that final point is the most impor­tant for this story. Android is, with­out a doubt, a soft­ware devel­op­ment plat­form, which, in theory means, that all of these devices should be able to run third party soft­ware. And that pos­si­bil­ity of open­ing up soft­ware devel­op­ment means that we may be approach­ing the next phase in the devel­op­ment (tip­ping point per­haps) of eReaders.

There’s also another take­away here. In a matter of a few days, Android has become a major plat­form player in the eReader space. If I was Apple or Microsoft⁴, I’d be taking notice at this point. If these third party com­pa­nies pull it off, Android will have offi­cially expanded beyond mobile phones to other hand held devices. Like­wise, if I was Amazon, I’d be a bit con­cerned as well. The Kindle is a closed plat­form, whose pri­mary appeal is based on an easy, one-​click buying expe­ri­ence – not nec­es­sar­ily a read­ing expe­ri­ence. All of these devices are inter­net enabled, mean­ing that it’s entirely pos­si­ble that they could bring a sim­i­lar one-​click expe­ri­ence to shop­ping for read­ing mate­r­ial. Couple that with poten­tially rev­o­lu­tion­ary read­ing expe­ri­ences and we could have the mak­ings of real Kindle killers.

Time will tell. And this should def­i­nitely make for an inter­est­ing Tools Of Change con­fer­ence this Spring!

1. sorry Guten­berg, but its true [↩]
2. At the time I pre­sented, the Plas­tic Logic reader, just renamed the Que, was one exam­ple of an coming eReader that was sup­posed to have an asso­ci­ated Soft­ware Devel­op­ment Kit. [↩]
3. Thank you to Evan Schnittman for remind­ing me of what makes Android such a entic­ing mobile devel­op­ment plat­form. [↩]
4. It’s some­what ironic that Android’s expan­sion to other mobile devices comes at a time when Microsoft is rebrand­ing its mobile plat­form as phone only. Though to be fair to MS, appar­ently the Plas­tic Logic Cue will run Win­dows CE. [↩]

• joe wikert on why the cur­rent crop of eread­ing devices are rather weak – http://​bit.​ly/​KSTMa #
• Ques­tions about eInk tech­nol­ogy? The OPL is set­ting up an inter­view with eInk Cor­po­ra­tion (http://​bit.​ly/​QX27u). Send us ques­tions to ask. #
• $#%! — I left for Ithaca this morn­ing with Dre's keys'. That means I'll be head­ing back to Rochester this after­noon. #
• Back in Ithaca after an overnight trip to Rah-​cha-​cha. And it's snow­ing here! Say hello to an early winter… #

Pow­ered by Twit­ter Tools.

• Gah — total tech­nol­ogy fail­ure in the middle of pre­sent­ing at an O'Reilly online sem­i­nar! not good! #
• 50 min­utes is just not enough time for a pre­sen­ta­tion! Ok… onto stu­dent grad­ing and then some blogging… #
• RT @EFS­lat­tery: RT @inkyel­bows: Pub­lish­ing is not a dying busi­ness; it's a CHANG­ING busi­ness. http://​bit.​ly/​2pzX2 (via @lau­rieabke­meier) #
• RT @mikeru­bits: The League of Move­able Type – a col­lec­tion of open source fonts: http://​www.​the​league​of​move​able​type.com/ #
• @cee­jayoz Oh Nooz – what hap­pened to your iPhone? in reply to cee­jayoz #
• Rita Mae's off at obe­di­ence lessons? What time is it? It's vacuum time! #

Pow­ered by Twit­ter Tools.

On Thurs­day I was a pre­sented on the future of eRead­ers (like the Kindle) at O’Rielly’s online Tools of Change con­fer­ence. It was a bit of an odd expe­ri­ence. While the talk was to an audi­ence of over 230 people, I never saw a single one of them (or heard them for that matter). I gave the talk from a study room in Cornell’s Mann library, using Webex soft­ware to show my slides and talk­ing to the audi­ence via a cell phone con­nec­tion (and a blue­tooth head­set). The only ref­er­ence to atten­dance was a par­tic­i­pant counter in the Webex interface.

It’s more than a little jar­ring to have no imme­di­ate feed­back (semi­otic backchan­nels) like body lan­guage, facial expres­sions, or other forms of crowd engage­ment while speak­ing. I could have tried fol­low­ing the par­tic­i­pant chat while I talked, but I wor­ried that I’d get to dis­tracted. On the plus side, I was able to play the “aging hipster”, pre­sent­ing in jeans and rep­re­sent­ing RIT Taga with one of their awe­some silkscreened shirts.

I did get a copy of the chat log (my favorite response was “Cultural Anthro­pol­ogy is the new Black.”) And there are a few sum­maries of my talk float­ing around. And for those in the audi­ence who stum­bled across this blog, over the next few days I’ll be post­ing short essays on what I dis­cussed both here and at the OPL’s site.

• Ok, I'm back to tweet­ing after a har­ried few days. Let's start things off right — Happy birth­day @aaron_t #
• A pretty amaz­ing Star Trek and Monty Python Mashup – http://​bit.​ly/​Yt7dI #
• Taught "Studying Dig­i­tal Culture" : Check — Ok, gradin' here I come! #

Pow­ered by Twit­ter Tools.